Servo Sinus at 0.95 compiled well and Some Question.

Create new topics, add your comment, remark, bugs...
Post Reply
just4you
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:45 am

Servo Sinus at 0.95 compiled well and Some Question.

Post by just4you » Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:16 pm

Lubin... Sorry about late response..
I'm very busy in my company..
I've tested with servo sinus example with 33FJ128GP706..
It complied well but I'm not running yet..
I'll post the experiment result and others...


I'm making a program with dsPIC..
but the simulink does not fit to the complicated programs.
So I tried to learn the stateflow and other design tools for the reason.
I think the stateflow is good tool but efficient for skilled designer.
If the program design is poor, I can't expect the happening..

I understood your blockset's configuration
after experienced related peripherals.
However, I prefer the easy usable tools.
That's the reason I choose the embedded target blockset.

I accept that this tool is very useful just for specialist,
but it's difficult to novices too.
Futhermore, I'm afraid that use of embedded target blockset make more additional works to me nowadays..


Good abstracted HAL serves easier use but not modifiable.
Complicated HAL serves various configuration but not easy to use.
What is good?

LubinKerhuel
Site Admin - Expert
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Bayonne- France
Contact:

Post by LubinKerhuel » Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:19 pm

It's up to you.

I use the toolbox for my PhD. I build complex models. I am very happy that I can concentrate much on the math and less on the peripheral configuration.
Stateflow is a very good tool. There is one or two important chapter to read in the help to fully exploit its possibility.

If the toolbox makes you waste your time, just don't use it!
If you are winning time, improve clarity of programs that are easily reusable and so on... just use it!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests